HormoneLog

What to bring to a 3-month HRT review

Updated September 4, 2026 · sources cited inline

NICE guideline NG23 recommends reviewing HRT "at 3 months to assess efficacy and tolerability; annually thereafter."

Two questions, then: is it doing what it was meant to, and how are you tolerating it? Both are answered from what has actually happened over those three months — which is very hard to reconstruct from memory in a short appointment.

A record that covers the three months

What is worth having written down:

Why dated dose changes matter so much

Because without the dates, nothing else can be interpreted. "I've felt better recently" and "I changed dose six weeks ago" mean something together and almost nothing apart. If you record only one thing, record what changed and when.

Questions worth writing down beforehand

The Menopause Society's advice to write your questions down in advance applies particularly here, because a review appointment is short and structured. Things people commonly wish they had asked:

What we can't tell you

Whether your HRT is working. Whether your dose is right. Whether a symptom is a side effect or something else. Those are clinical judgements about you specifically, and no app or website is in a position to make them. What a good record does is put your clinician in a much better position to make them well.

This is general information, not medical advice. HormoneLog is a tracking tool, not a diagnostic or treatment device, and nothing here can tell you whether your symptoms are normal, what they mean, or what you should do about them. Those are conversations for a clinician who knows your history.
Cite this pageHormoneLog. "What to bring to a 3-month HRT review." Baker Ventures LLC, September 4, 2026. https://hormonelog.bakerventuresstudio.com/guides/hrt-review-appointment